14 Following


Currently reading

Vineland (Classic, 20th-Century, Penguin)
Thomas Pynchon
Tristes Tropiques
John Weightman, Doreen Weightman, Patrick Wilcken, Claude Lévi-Strauss
Richard III
William Shakespeare
The Dwarf
Alexandra Dick, Pär Lagerkvist
The Collected Poems of Wilfred Owen
Wilfred Owen, Cecil Day-Lewis
Richard Wolin
Giotto to Dürer: Early Renaissance Painting in the National Gallery
Jill Dunkerton, Susan Foister, Dillian Gordon, Nicholas Penny
Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
Hubert L. Dreyfus, Paul Rabinow
Gravity's Rainbow
Thomas Pynchon
A Gravity's Rainbow Companion: Sources and Contexts for Pynchon's Novel
Steven Weisenburger
The Passion of Michel Foucault - James  Miller An intellectual biography that is absolutely first-rate..., intelligent, intriguing... for anyone who want to understand not just Foucault (who turns out to be a far more intricate and sympathetic figure than I would have thought), but the whole nature of the postwar postmodernist scene: Nietzschean, Heideggerian, Surrealists...

There is one telling and amusing anecdote that Miller recounts. Habermas spent a short time in the Winter of 1983 at the Collège France, and though the two had many philosophical differences, they had several interesting meetings, one of which in particular Habermas shared with the Miller, and which Foucault himself had written about. Habermas explained how Foucault had told him that he (Foucault) had broken with Phenomenalogy ("that meant Husserl, Sartre, and so on...") via Structuralism and Heidegger; while he, Habermas, had come under the saw of Heidegger and freed himself from this once he realized the political implications of Heidegger's work, "or at least the particular thrust" of it in the early 1930's... But Foucault remembered once finding that one of his professors, who was a great Kantian and very well known in the 30's, had written texts from around 1934 that were "thoroughly Nazi in orientation", and then deciding that it meant nothing..., and that Habermas' critique was thus "one-sided".

A debate we are still conducting....

A thoroughly marvelous book!